Category Archives: Editor’s Blog
Nerding about town: Review of Festival of the Spoken Nerd
I have already seen some of the positive reviews floating about Twitter today about Festival of the Spoken Nerd – the wonderful show performed by Helen Arney, Steve Mould and Matt Parker but we’ll add our two pence as well. We had a short interview with the three nerds a few weeks ago on the Pod Delusion to talk about the show if you are interested here.
Even though your intrepid editor and myself are still feeling quite under the weather, we gathered what strength we had and figured if we died laughing, it would be the best way to go.
We hadn’t seen any of the previous FOSTN shows down at the New Red Lion Theatre so we didn’ t know entirely what to expect – though having seen both Helen Arney and Matt Parker perform, we knew that we would be in for some clever and entertaining comedy. We were not disappointed.
There is something genuinely lovely about being in an audience who know must be nerdy by the fact they are going to a comedy celebration of nerdiness. The three on stage are also just such nice people that it does feel like a festive atmosphere. As well, for us, the Bloomsbury Theatre is the home of Robin Ince’s 9 Lessons and Carols so it’s a comfortable and familiar venue.
There was a lot packed into the show and most of it was entirely new material for us - which is rare as we generally see a lot of the science/comedy scene in London. Even the bits that we had seen before like Andrea Sella (@SellaTheChemist) setting stuff on fire with bright blue lights and recognizable ‘barks’ will never get old. Andrea was one of the special guests alongside Kent Valentine (@KentValentine) who had an excellent, just ridiculous story about his 15 year old self and a friend making napalm while his mother was out. I don’t know if the routine is floating about YouTube or not but I would encourage seeing him based on that bit alone. Who knows, maybe he’ll show up at some of the other FOSTN big shows (more on that later) as well.
One of the most intriguing bits of the show, which I am fascinated by, were the solids of constant width. 3D objects that have the same width no matter which way they face/lie. To prove this, Steve Mould had many of these wonderful shapes made and then proceeded to try and float across the stage on them. It was an excellent demonstration of mathematical concepts and comedy (replete with dressing up as his tiny lego man counterpart for the previous section demonstrating shapes of constant width to the audience). This sketch really sums up for me the true brilliance of the show: on one hand I was absolutely fascinated by this abstract concept and Steve’s obsession with the shapes of constant width but he then makes it hilarious. I am now going to remember that concept for a very long time (I just wish there was a nerdy enough pub quiz for it to be used in!) In true nerdy fashion, Steve and Matt are going to have many of the shapes of constant width made where you will be able to purchase one – they’ll at least have one sale as I am going to get one when available.
The three seem to work effortlessly at banter and performing together on stage. Helen Arney’s songs are always amusing (Keep your trousers on Archimedes was probably my favourite); Matt Parker can make any graph interesting; and Steve Mould’s experiments are brilliant. The only thing that tended to break up the flow (for me) was that they asked the audience if they had any questions after the various sketches. I imagine it would work in a smaller venue but for the larger one, it slowed down the pace of the show a bit. Nonetheless, some of the questions and answers given were equally amusing as the sketches.
Overall, it was a wonderfully indulgent night of geekery. If anyone has made a new years resolution about getting out to see more shows, there are two more Festival of the Spoken Nerd MASSSIVE shows coming up in the next several months. There is a second date at the Bloomsbury Theatre on the 22nd of May but sooner than that and also MORE MASSIVE is the Theatre Royal Haymarket gig next month on February 2nd. Support nerd comedy goodness so we can have more! What can be better than filling the theatres and venues with smart, sophisticated, clever comedy that tickles every nerdy bone in your body?
Liz Lutgendorff, Deputy Editor
December Round Up
It hasn’t been an especially busy month for James and I but we did manage to catch a few interesting events around London. Generally, if we don’t get interviews at an event we still feel like we need to tell you about it.
Holy Quarks at the Wellcome Trust
So first up was Holy Quarks, put on by the Wellcome Trust. It was a Saturday conference with music on the Friday, however we only made the Saturday event. It was an interesting attempt at bridging the growing divide between science and religion. The arguments that some people advanced at the conference was that they two can work together. It started with an interesting talk (with lovely pictures) Felicity Powell who put together the exhibition on charms. While saying she was a rather secular person herself, she nonethless enjoyed working with such interesting objects – some extraordinarily tiny. The highlight for us though, was Alom Shaha‘s talk on Science vs Religion in the Classroom. It seemed to be the most honest of the talks of the day, arguing against what many of the speakers were trying to convey. He told about the conflict in his classroom and gave every day evidence that there is a a conflict, or at least a very stated tension between what he has to teach and what many of his students believe.
I got slightly annoyed with the talk titled Science, Faith and Doubt: Lessons from history byThomas Dixon as I didn’t agree with the examples he used. It’s rather easy to say there isn’t a conflict between religion and science in the 17th century (even with Galileo) as *everyone* had to be religious. Even in the 18th century this was largely true. Where the interesting conflict arises in the 19th century with the professionalization of science. As well, he quoted a later version of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, rather than the first edition. This could be pedantry but it was this quote:
“There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.”
instead he quoted the sixth edition:
There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.
Which could be an entire lecture in itself.
I do enjoy these types of conferences and it is interesting to see what arguments are being used to bring the two – religion and science – together. It is a worthy endeavour to see where there isn’t conflict to ensure that we aren’t succumbing to a fallacy but I think I’m going to need some more evidence before I believe there isn’t a problem.
Ghosts of Christmas Lectures Past
The second big event that we went to was the same day at the Royal Institution for The Ghosts of Christmas Lectures Past, MC’d by the seemingly omnipresent Robin Ince. I’m beginning to think he’s actually The Doctor for his ability to fly around the country and put on so many shows.
We’ve been to quite a few events this year, covering them and recording them for you, our voracious listener and I can say that this was one of the best events of the year. Robin and the RI had assembled a wonderful group of passionate science fans to present to us some of the best stuff from Christmas Lectures past. Now, I am new to the whole Christmas Lecture thing and so I don’t have a favourite or even a deep knowledge of them. However, I now have a new desire to trawl the RI archives and learn everything about them after this event.
So the format was pretty straight forward – Robin Ince hosted and introduced guests and they each gave a short talk on who was their favourite Lecturer or in the case of Helen Arney, their favourite technician! Topped off by the fact that we were in the Faraday Lecture Theatre just made it a lovely night. Matt Parker (who will also get a mention in the next section) probably got the most ooos and ahhs with the wave machine used in the first maths Christmas Lecture by Professor Sir Christopher Zeeman in 1978. The dialogue between Professor Zeeman and the BBC about the use of formulae on screen was hysterical.
Adam Rutherford touched on a issue that is becoming more important to me: the brain and gaming. As I’ve become increasingly interested in the Xbox and the gaming joy it provides, I have also been annoyed by the scaremongering of Dr. Susan Greenfield. I even did a bit of a historical rant about it on our Questival Special. Adam’s use of Fruit Ninja to demonstrate how our brains change was excellent. It will be interesting to see as the gamer population ages and takes over that of those non-gamers in editorial positions if this sort of thing will just go away. It is nice to see someone standing up for it now though!
Another person who will make an appearance later on was Professor Andrea Sella from UCL who did marvellous things with bubbles and also was responsible for the ether left out for so long!
The brilliant thing about the lectures was the unabashed love song to science. Everything was marked by a profound sense of joy and awe towards science. The night seemed to capture the idea of wonder in science and how it is conveyed to a popular audience through these lectures. It was an absolutely captivating event and one that I personally would love repeated.
Infinite Monkey Cage
I also managed to go to two Infinite Monkey Cage recordings, which were hilarious. The first was with Nick Lane, the above mentioned Adam Rutherford and Tim Minchin. The second was this week with Roger Highfield, Richard Dawkins and Mark Gatiss. I think the BBC should never let go of the Infinite Monkey Cage; in fact it should have more science based programs. Maybe a skeptical one too. With a news-magazine format…
Anyway, you will be able to listen to both of these if they tickle your fancy. A particular highlight was Richard Dawkins telling everyone to have a Merry Christmas – possibly because I know how much it must annoy the Daily Mail.
9 Lessons and Carols
The latest event was, of course, 9 Lessons and Carols for Godless people. What is becoming an annual event, with its fourth sell out year, was excellent. For me, it is only when 9 Lessons comes around that it really does feel like Christmas. I hope Robin never stops organizing them, or at least when he tires of it, passes the mantle on to other such science enthused comedians so we can continue to have our own unabashedly science and holiday fuelled festive celebration.
The only possible problem for me at any of these kind of events is that we generally see a lot of them throughout the year and so could potentially get repetitive. However, largely this was brand new material from most of the comedians but there were also a lot of new faces for me which was excellent.
The entire night was lovely, the right sort of tone and honest celebration of both the festive season but also what we all love, science and geekery. It’s hard to say who the highlights were as it was all pretty much brilliant. Helen Keen was on form as usual – I admire the amount of history of NASA she knows. Basically, I appreciate any healthy interest in history (we might be recording something with Helen in the new year, so watch out for that, maybe!). The other Helen of the night, Helen Arney’s clever swap of Santa for Cerny in a rendition of Santa, Baby was inspired (if you are lucky, you might get it hear it on the Infinite Monkey Cage on the 26th but only if they manage to secure the rights for the tune). Another wonderful musical number was Gavin Osborn singing about Carl Sagan and Voyager 1 and 2. Perhaps, made more resonant with me after our interview with Ed Stone!
As I mentioned above, Matt Parker makes another appearance with his talk about the two mathematicians that predicted the future. As I said on Twitter, the self-referential graph material was inspired. There’s a phrase that probably doesn’t get used a lot, unless perhaps, you know Matt Parker. Another RI Ghosts of Christmas Lectures past alumni Andrea Sella had a rather….illuminated talk? Which involved lighting gases on fire, including in a 4-5 ft test tube that belched flame out the top! The final act of the night was Mark Thomas, who is always pitch perfect. I had not seen the People’s Manifesto tour which is what he mainly talked about so I was at least very entertained.
There are still some 9 Lessons and Carols gigs left, though they are all sold out. However, just keep an eye on Twitter as usually there are a few people who can’t make it and you can snap up some of the tickets. But if you can’t make (or really, even if you do) you can always see Festival of the Spoken Nerd in the new year!
So that was our December! Some familiar faces, Helen Keen, Helen Arney, Matt Parker and of course, Robin Ince who we hope are not getting terribly sick of us. But also some new people who look forward to seeing much more of like Andrea Sella and Alom Shaha. It was a very science-y December but the celebration of wonder and curiosity is what I really remember. I hope I can keep up with all this next year, even though I should be starting my PhD in the history of the secular movement. Luckily, the who overlap quite a bit so just expect long diversions into 19th century science history
Happy Christmas and have a fantastic New Year!
Can you help our Hitchmas Special?
So we’ve had the sad news that Christopher Hitchens has died. Given that he was such and important and influential figure in our.. movement.. or whatever the hell this is, we’ve decided that if we can get enough material together next week’s programme won’t be a Christmas Winterval special, but a Hitchmas Special.
As we’re not best placed to properly reflect on Hitchens, nor did we ever get the chance to interview him (though do have a listen to the superb Little Atoms episode featuring Hitch) I want to do it a bit like how we normally do the Pod Delusion – in addition to featuring reports on Hitchens and his work, I want to spin off of topics that are related to his work and are interesting.
As he was such as important figure though I want to open this out a bit more than just our contributors, does anyone else want to contribute to such a programme? Deadlines are tight – we need to put this to bed on Wednesday 21st.
Some ideas I’d like to see include:
- Attacking sacred cows – Hitch was famous for this, anyone have any interesting tales of other people who have gone against the grain (a la slagging off Mother Theresa), and turned out to be actually right?
- Hitch’s contribution to skepticism as a movement – what did he bring to the table?
- Who is the next Hitchens? Can we prematurely enoble someone as “the next Christopher Hitchens?”
…and so on. If you’ve got any other ideas for features we could have, let us know in the comments below. And if you’d like to contribute, drop me a line on editor@poddelusion.co.uk.
I love you all – thanks for everyone’s support and help
So you may have spotted the rather urgent sounding blog post last Friday morning. I was about to start this next sentence with “without revealing too many details” – but it’s probably a bit late for that given that my first instinct was to spread the word rather than play it quietly, talking in riddles like they do on Mad Men – but our deputy editor, Liz Lutgendorff has rather unfortunately lost her job.
Don’t worry – I’m not sacking her from the Pod Delusion (that would certainly make things awkward when we’re sat watching telly together) – it was her real job. Y’know, the one that pays the bills. The blog post with her CV on was posted maybe within 20 minutes of us finding out (I was sat across from her when she received the e-mail). My interest in this, for those of you who haven’t figured this out yet, is that I live with her and she is my partner. And any emotional nonsense aside, I can’t afford the rent on our flat alone.
So anyway, the reason I’m writing this post is because it turns out that our listeners, our followers, our friends and our community are absolutely amazing. Upon the alarm being raised you lovely, lovely people starting retweeting, researching and calling in favours. And whilst Liz hasn’t found anything just yet she’s already received lots of leads to follow up – including some which seem rather promising.
So THANK YOU EVERYONE. I LOVE YOU ALL. You’ve all been amazing during this, er, time of need, if I can use such a phrase when it’s not linked to either bereavement or tragedy (either way, it’s a bit of a pisser). It really is heartwarming and humbling to see everyone helping her out – I’m not a good enough writer to accurately articulate my gratitude towards everyone.
If you’d like to help out Liz in the meantime, you can find her CV and contact details here. I can vouch for her being amazing – though if you’ve listened to the Pod Delusion you’ll already know that. Or if you’re feeling generous, why not subscribe and donate a fiver (or a tenner) a month to the Pod Delusion?
Urgent: Deputy Editor Liz needs a job ASAP
Okay guys, our deputy editor Liz Lutgendorff has lost her job and needs a new one. I (James) live with her and as a result if she doesn’t secure a new job soon we may lose our house. So if anyone reading can please offer Liz any help, it would be greatly appreciated. If you can help her please get in touch – she is based in London. Here’s some details:
Skills
Project management: Planning, research, logistics, quality control, Prince2 Foundation attained
Research: Participation in numerous research projects, primary and secondary source expert, archive research, survey research, business research
IT skills: MS Office (Excel, Visio, Word, Outlook, Power Point), solid understanding of SQL queries, web-admin, community based forums, Salesforce (CRM), wikis, HTML, Photoshop, Google Apps
Editing/Proofreading: Copy editing, proof reading, marketing, expert in alternative format processes, audio/video editing
Event planning: Logistics, organization, speaker sourcing, speaker liaison
Communication: Social Media: (Twitter, Facebook, etc), blogging platforms, online forums, international meeting set up, phone/video conferencing set up, email, telephone, face-to-face meetings, CEO level contact with multinational corporations, interviews
Education
Birkbeck College, University of London (2010)
- Masters Degree – History
University of Western Ontario (2004)
- BA (hons) – History
Qualifications
Prince2 – Project Management 2011
- Passed with certificate
ISO 9001 – Internal Auditor 2010 (updated)
- Passed with certificate
Contact Details
- E-Mail: liz@poddelusion.co.uk
- Twitter: @sillypunk
Boring Conference 2011
A few weeks ago, your intrepid editor and myself traipsed over to Hackney to take in the Boring Conference. We arrived slightly late, as we were interviewing Marcus Chown that morning but still managed to hear about Budgens, About a Boy, bar codes and the sound of vending machines. All this was topped off by Adam Curtis talking about the bits of video between videos on the BBC and wondering if we are experiencing cultural stagnation akin to the end of Soviet Russia.
The Boring conference wonderfully pokes fun about the attendees and speakers own geekiness and love of the obscure, pedantic and in any other hands, the boring. It was delightful and each talk was a surprise either through making the otherwise beige content interesting or often very funny, though some elements didn’t work for me: the possible post-modern jokes in between speakers (but maybe I’m missing something because of my innate foreignness); the venue’s acoustics from way in the back; and the venue was rather cold after the afternoon sun started to dip.
Those, though, are ephemeral notes compared to the content of the conference which was excellent. Matt Parker was on top form (as usual) giving an extended talk about bar codes. If you’ve seen him at the Uncaged Monkey tour or other events, you may have seen it part of the act before. However, he expanded on the original theme and ventured into the wonderful world of QR codes which was amazing for its capacity for redundancy. A highlight for me was the improbable yet prodigious amounts photographs from location research for Stanley Kubrick, the talk given by Jon Ronson. As James said at the time, it was like the equivalent of Google Streetview from when Eyes Wide Shut was filmed. It was absolutely ridiculous. I found myself oddly fascinated by the vending machine noise talk given by Felicity Ford, recent PhD graduate from Oxford-Brookes.
The finale with Adam Curtis turned the very idea of the Boring Conference on its head, wondering if the concept of the Boring Conference fit it with the idea of cultural stagnation. Perhaps not the best way to end the night, giving a overall critique of our inability to escape from our current predicament, but definitely food for thought.
Who knows if there will be a Boring Conference 2012, perhaps the cultural malaise and stagnation will have taken us through boring and into ennui. I’m not sure what kind of conference that would make. But congratulations to James Ward for making the Boring Conference 2011 thoroughly enjoyable.
Polygamy Update: British Columbia rules on test case.
At Pod Delusion live at the inaugural QED conference, I did a rather different report (for me, anyway) on the then current case in the Supreme Court of British Columbia about decriminalizing polygamy.
There are a few things you may need to know before I continue. One, Canada has legalized gay marriage (indeed was the fourth country in the world to do so and the first in the Americas); and two Canada has a very large Mormon community in Bountiful, British Columbia who practice polygamy, though they haven’t been successfully charged with polygamy over their many years in British Columbia. Indeed, the test case was launched because of failed prosecutions under the current law for those in the Bountiful community.
Why are the two related? One of the criticisms of allowing gay marriage in Canada was that it would lead to the decriminalization, or more generally, acceptance of alternative forms of marriage – the slippery slope argument as it were. However, this is not what has happened. Instead the BC Supreme Court has ruled that it basically comes down to harm as BC Chief Justice Robert Bauman states in the ruling: “More specifically, Parliament’s reasoned apprehension of harm arising out of the practice of polygamy. This includes harm to women, to children, to society and to the institution of monogamous marriage.” There are also many other interesting aspects to the ruling, so I encourage you to have a read to at least the ruling (possibly not all 335 pages of it though!)
There is a polyamory association in Canada (not affiliated with the community at Bountiful) that was also giving evidenced at the trial – but I’d argue that the issue of not getting married is probably not as necessary for those in the polyamory community as it is with the Mormon community and so the former are not affected as much by the ruling. Indeed, the spokersperson for the Canadian Polyamory Advocacy Association stated “the formality of marriage is really not a big issue in the polyamorous community”. Though, if there is a ceremony it still may criminalize these unions – an area which the CPAA would like clarified. It would be nice to see the liberalization of laws that protect binaries in marriage – which the ruling more or less explicitly states – but at this point, I agree with the judge in that it would cause harm. He specifically states that minors who find themselves in polygamous unions should not be charged. This is telling in itself and a good reason why the current law should have been upheld – the issue of child brides in Mormon communities. But it wasn’t just about marriage, there was a lot in Bountiful that also made polygamy a harmful practice; one being the expulsion of young men as there weren’t enough women to go around to furnish them all with multiple brides. There is now the question of what happens to the excess brides of such illegal unions (many who might be illegal immigrants in part of a wife trade between Mormon communities in the US).
While the ruling obvious impedes some freedom of religion (in this case that of the Mormons) it is allowed to discriminate based on the first clause in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms:
“1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.”
I realize that such a term may lead to a conservative interpretation of what may be considered reasonable but I think thus far it has been largely a good force in Canadian law. I imagine there is someone who’d make the argument for the opposite. Indeed, this case could be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada – so the saga may not end. It would be helpful for the non-Mormon poly community to have some safety in that their non-solemnized unions are perfectly safe and free from criminal prosecution. I would support polyamorous unions per se, but as the largest vocal representatives of the practice so far has a proven record for: trafficking minors for the express purpose of marriage; lack of good education; a huge lack of women’s rights; problems with physical and sexual abuse of women and minors; and the tendency to ostracize their younger, male members – which tends to weigh heavily against the poly community in Canada. It’s a hard balance, I grant you that: the limiting of damaging religious practices with the liberal, egalitarian ones. There is also the danger of Canada becoming a haven for those extreme religious groups that still practice polygamy.
It will be interesting to see if this goes to the highest court in the land and if there can be some sort of nuance brought to the existing laws or a continuation of what has been in place for the last 100 years or so. It was certainly an interesting year to watch law proceedings in Canada!
Blog post by Liz Lutgendorff
Turning the tables on the Guardian’s Science Weekly
Tomorrow, if all goes to plan, I’m going to be accompanying Graham Steel to meet the guys behind the Guardian’s (excellent) Science Weekly podcast. Graham has organised a bit of a podcast recording to essentially ‘turn the tables’ on them. So we’re wondering in advance – does anyone have anything they’d like answered? Or any issues in science and journalism that you’d like to hear their take on?
I think Graham’s plan is to touch on issues as diverse as churnalism, the science blogging landscape, social media and linking to sources – can you think of anything we can add to this?
Let us know in the comments below!
The Pod Delusion on BBC Click
A few weeks ago Liz and I were filmed for the BBC’s technology programme ‘Click’, which is shown on the BBC News channel domestically, and BBC World around the world. The feature, by LJ Rich, was on the topic of whether the corporate podcasters are killing the bedroom podcasters. I gave my two cents, and somehow LJ managed to make me seem vaguely coherent. Watch it below:
Partnering with the British Humanist Association
Exciting news everyone – we’re now officially partners with the British Humanist Association. We’ve been friends with them for a while – they like what we do, and we like what they do, so we decided to formalise our relationship.
Though this is exciting – I know you lot are a skeptical bunch, so I want to clarify what this actually means.
We retain complete editorial independence – the decisions on content, what we talk about, who we talk to and so on are not going to be run past the BHA first for their stamp of approval. Similarly, we will not be changing our content in the slightest. Having our lead story as “God still doesn’t exist” every week would get a bit tedious – the contents of the podcast is not going to change. We’re still going to have provocative reports slagging off Remembrance Day and interviews with interesting people regardless of how they define their personal philosophy. What’s unified the podcast since day one has been a set of values, rather than a set of topics – those of rationalism, critical thinking, and of course, things that are just plain interesting.
Similarly, we’re still going to talk to other organisations – be they the National Secular Society, the JREF, the Church of England or even a certain litigious cult, should they want to speak to us. Just because we’re partnered with the BHA doesn’t mean that after every report we’re going to say “And now here’s what the BHA thinks, and what you should think too”. We’ll obviously be approaching the BHA should they have relevant comments to make – like we’ve been doing anyway.
Also, in case it’s not obvious – the BHA do not ‘own’ the Pod Delusion. I do, still. It’s not going to be “The BHA’s Pod Delusion” or “The Pod Delusion, brought to you by the BHA”. We’re still going to be “The Pod Delusion” and I’ll still be as foul-mouthed as usual.
If the above wasn’t the case then we wouldn’t have agreed to partner – compromising editorial independence and the ability for me to use the podcast for my own (possibly evil) agenda would have been a deal breaker for me.
So why have we done this? I’ll tell you now – no money has changed hands. What we’ve essentially got is a cross-promotional quid-pro-quo. We’re going to put a couple of links on the Pod Delusion site, and in return the BHA are going to put a page about us on their website – as well as put a bit in their weekly newsletter to their members about us. We figure that humanists are a fairly receptive audience to what we have to say – so hopefully this should make the show even more popular, and allow us to grow even more!
Of course, if you have any questions, comments, or want to call us sell outs, put them in the comments below and I’ll attempt to address them.
James








The Pod Delusion is now broadcast on Resonance 104.4FM in London on Sundays at 11am. You can find out more about Resonance FM and listen to their live stream on their
The Pod Delusion are partners of the 


