<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 41 &#8211; 9th July 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poddelusion.co.uk/blog/2010/07/09/episode-41-9th-july-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://poddelusion.co.uk/blog/2010/07/09/episode-41-9th-july-2010/</link>
	<description>A Podcast about Interesting Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:39:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Emlyn-Jones</title>
		<link>http://poddelusion.co.uk/blog/2010/07/09/episode-41-9th-july-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-2228</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Emlyn-Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 12:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poddelusion.co.uk/blog/?p=221#comment-2228</guid>
		<description>The question over whether Skeptics and Atheists are synonymous and interchangable is one that I&#039;ve pondered a lot. Whenever I ask anybody for a definition of Skeptics and Skepticism the reply I get is that it&#039;s a person or thoughtform which embraces rationalism and science. But there are many of people who are not Skeptics, and who are sometimes opponents of prominent Skeptics, who claim to be scientific and rational. So that is more of a slogan than a definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question over whether Skeptics and Atheists are synonymous and interchangable is one that I&#8217;ve pondered a lot. Whenever I ask anybody for a definition of Skeptics and Skepticism the reply I get is that it&#8217;s a person or thoughtform which embraces rationalism and science. But there are many of people who are not Skeptics, and who are sometimes opponents of prominent Skeptics, who claim to be scientific and rational. So that is more of a slogan than a definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicamy</title>
		<link>http://poddelusion.co.uk/blog/2010/07/09/episode-41-9th-july-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>nicamy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poddelusion.co.uk/blog/?p=221#comment-772</guid>
		<description>Hi, just found this podcast as a &quot;new skeptic&quot; gearing up to attend TAM London. Apart from some sound issues, I thought it was great, especially the atheism piece. I&#039;m looking forward to future episodes and keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, just found this podcast as a &#8220;new skeptic&#8221; gearing up to attend TAM London. Apart from some sound issues, I thought it was great, especially the atheism piece. I&#8217;m looking forward to future episodes and keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sjhoward.co.uk &#187; Pod Delusion Episode 41</title>
		<link>http://poddelusion.co.uk/blog/2010/07/09/episode-41-9th-july-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>sjhoward.co.uk &#187; Pod Delusion Episode 41</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 16:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poddelusion.co.uk/blog/?p=221#comment-771</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m on The Pod Delusion again this week, talking about something&#8230; esoteric. And a bit political. Why not have a listen? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m on The Pod Delusion again this week, talking about something&#8230; esoteric. And a bit political. Why not have a listen? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

