[Direct MP3 Link]
TV Leadership Debates by Tom Morris
What Really Happens on Polling Day by Alex Foster
Electoral Reform by Malden Capell
NHS Efficiency Savings by Simon Howard
Boobquake by Liz Lutgendorff
Follow up links:
TV Leadership Debates by Tom Morris
What Really Happens on Polling Day by Alex Foster
Electoral Reform by Malden Capell
NHS Efficiency Savings by Simon Howard
Boobquake by Liz Lutgendorff
Follow up links:
You can follow all the replies to this entry through the comments feed.

₤5/month:
₤10/month:
₤15/month:
₤20/month:
One-off Donation:
Subscribe via:
The Pod Delusion is now broadcast on Resonance 104.4FM in London on Sundays at 11am. You can find out more about Resonance FM and listen to their live stream on their website.
The Pod Delusion are partners of the British Humanist Association. We're totally editorially independent and much less professional than they are, but we like what they do. And you might too, so do check them out.
Latest Blog Entries:
© 2010 The Pod Delusion. Design by yulian yordanov — Built on WP Framework

Regarding Tom Morris’s piece on leadership debates, in the US, the last presidential debate sponsored by the League of Women Voters was in 1984. Since then, they have been sponsored by the Commission for Presidential Debates, an entity created and controlled by the two major parties. So please don’t look to the US for a model of sponsorship of this important new (for you) political event.
I listened to this episode, in the rain, whilst doing a leaflet run round the local area. It kept my spirits up, especially the interesting review of different ways of translating votes to representation.
Wow, just about everything Malden said about STV was incorrect. Transferred votes under STV have full strength, not reduced in any way. Secondly it IS proportional when used in multi-member constituencies as the Lib Dems propose (the more seats there are per constituency the more proportional it becomes). Thirdly it wouldn’t make the system unfair in the Lib Dems’ favour at all, as a proportional system it represents parties proportional to their vote. By “unfair” what you actually mean is that most people who vote for them wouldn’t be effectively disenfranchised any longer. If they got 20% of the vote they would get 20% of the seats, exactly as any other party would.
Also AV does solve one problem of FPTP and that’s the fact it doesn’t force people to vote for a party they don’t support to stop a more disliked party to get it.